James J. Benko
1
Sometimes it is better to use an electric current to get metals into solution rather than acid(s), especially when it is necessary to preserve the integrity of the sample surface.
Useful for such items as coins or metallic art objects, electrographic techniques are, for all intents and purposes, virtually non-destructive since only traces of metal are removed. Sufficient metal dissolves for microchemical tests when a 10-50 milliamp current, supplied by one or two flashlight batteries, passes through a specimen for a few seconds. The specimen rests on a small piece of filter paper moistened with an aqueous electrolyte solution of sodium chloride or sodium nitrate.
A clever apparatus for doing this is described by Nordmann (1) and also by Weisz (2), both authors attributing it to Fritz (3). I have constructed this apparatus from ordinary materials readily available today. It is simple to make and simple to use.
The finished apparatus is shown in Figure 1. Obviously, numerous variations can be made such as adding an ammeter, using different sized batteries/holders (Nordmann' uses a 1.5-volt dry cell), using different metals for anodes/cathodes, using different electrolytes, etc.
METHODThis should allow enough metal to be transferred to the filter paper for analysis (Figure 2). Microchemical tests for suspected metals can then be made using reagents commonly employed such as dithizone, dimethylglyoxime, thioacetamide, etc. The filter paper discs can also be used in ring-oven tests for further separation and identification as described by Weisz (2). Changing the physical size of the anode/cathode may be necessary to test large objects such as lamps, statues, etc., but the basic principle remains the same.
FOOTNOTES
1 Microspec Analytical, 3352 128th Ave., Holland, MI, 49442